Saba Mahmood
Saba Mahmood is associate professor of social cultural anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley. Her book, Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (Princeton University Press, 2005) won the American Political Science Association Victoria Schuck Award in 2005. She has been an advisory board member of the Critical Theory Initiative and Center for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of California, Berkeley since 2004. Her publications include “Secularism, Hermeneutics, Empire: The Politics of Islamic Reformation,” Public Culture (Duke University Press, 2006), “Ethical Formation and Politics of Individual Autonomy in Contemporary Egypt,” Social Research (2003), “Questioning Liberalism, Too: A Response to ‘Islam and the Challenge of Democracy,’” Boston Review: A Political and Literary Forum (Aril/May 2003), “Feminism, the Taliban, and Politics of Counter-Insurgency” (with Charles Hirschkind), Anthropological Quarterly (2002), and “Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival,” Cultural Anthropology (2001), which won the Cultural Horizon Prize from the Society for Cultural Anthropology in 2002.
Posts by Saba Mahmood:
Wednesday, May 7th, 2008
Calls for the embrace (or for that matter rejection) of secularism are premised on a putative opposition between secular and religious worldviews wherein each is defined as a necessary and stable essence that is superior to the other. It is argued that there is an essential kernel to secularism that must be preserved and defended from religious extremism and backwardness. For some this is secularism’s scientific rationality, for others it is secularism’s incipient objectivity, and for yet others it is secularism’s strict separation between state and religion. The idea that the “good” elements in secularism can be distinguished from its “bad” sides, the latter discarded and the former refined, only serves to further reinforce the blackmail that one is either for or against secularism.
Read the rest of Secular imperatives?.
Posted in Is critique secular? | 1 Comment » |
Sunday, March 30th, 2008
One of the most cherished definitions of critique is the incessant subjection of all norms to unyielding critique. Or is it?
Read the rest of Is critique secular?.
Posted in Is critique secular?, Rethinking secularism | 2 Comments » |