<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Religion &amp; American politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/category/religion-american-politics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Dobson/Obama Rorschach test</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/07/10/the-dobsonobama-rorschach-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/07/10/the-dobsonobama-rorschach-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Schmalzbauer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Constructing evangelicals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years Barack Obama has courted the support of evangelicals. Way back in 2006, Obama served as the keynote speaker at the Call to Renewal conference, a gathering of religious progressives sponsored by the evangelical <em>Sojourners</em> magazine. Citing the religious activism of Frederick Douglass, William Jennings Bryan, Dorothy Day, and Martin Luther King, Jr., Obama went out of his way to praise the social engagement of evangelicals like Rick Warren, T.D. Jakes, Jim Wallis, and Tony Campolo. At the time, Obama's speech was hailed by evangelicals and others as a model of religious political engagement. But that wasn't the reaction Focus on the Family's James Dobson had this summer after hearing the speech for the first time. Though the Dobson/Obama debate is itself worthy of analysis, it is even more useful as a Rorschach test for contemporary evangelicalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/07/10/the-dobsonobama-rorschach-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The preacher and the politician</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/06/03/the-preacher-and-the-politician/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/06/03/the-preacher-and-the-politician/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Hopkins</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent formal departure of Senator Barack Obama from Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago will no doubt resurface a debate over Obama's relation to Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.  Who could have predicted such volatility over race, faith, and justice in a campaign for the highest office in the land? The unprecedented introduction of race, religion, the black church, and black liberation theology into the presidential contest offers us an occasion to reflect on the role of the preacher, the politician, traditional race relations, and multicultural America. Obama and Wright exhibit this contrast.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/06/03/the-preacher-and-the-politician/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misrepresenting Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/29/misrepresenting-islam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/29/misrepresenting-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na`im</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Islam and the Secular State]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a title="Posts on Islam and the Secular State" href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/category/islam-and-the-secular-state/" target="_self"><img class="alignright alignnone size-medium wp-image-224" style="float: right; border: 0;" src="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/isssmall.jpg" alt="" width="77" height="119" /></a>Suggestions that Presidential candidate Barack Obama was a Muslim seemed to have subsided when his controversial pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, walked onto the stage. But even as Obama defended his Christian faith, and his choice of churches, speculation about his connection to Islam continued on-line as well as within the mainstream press, including an Op-Ed entitled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/opinion/12luttwak.html?_r=1&#38;ref=opinion&#38;oref=slogin" target="_blank">“President Apostate”</a> in <em>The New York Times</em> (May 12, 2008) by the military strategist and historian Edward Luttwak (and, exactly a week later, in a May 19 <em>Christian Science Monitor</em> Op-Ed entitled <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0519/p09s02-coop.html" target="_blank">“Barack Obama–Muslim Apostate?“</a>). Now, as if to flip the Muslim coin, Mr. Luttwak, Ms. Burki, and others speculate that Muslims will hold Mr. Obama to a higher religious standard because he does not embrace the religion of his father. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/29/misrepresenting-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, Wright, and Trinity</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/19/obama-wright-and-trinity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/19/obama-wright-and-trinity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randal Jelks</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The East Coast media establishment---both "conservatives" and "liberals"---continue to ask the same question about Senator Barack Obama: why did he keep his membership at Trinity United Church of Christ, where the Reverend Jeremiah Wright was the pastor? The question is asked as though Obama is naïve and Wright is a madman, neither of which is true. But what I find rather more amusing, or perhaps alarming---at least from a religious perspective---is that most of the media personalities who ask this question appear to have never belonged to any kind of religious community themselves. And this is, to a large extent, why there is so much misunderstanding about the relationship between Obama and Wright. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/19/obama-wright-and-trinity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Being Benedict</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/13/being-benedict/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/13/being-benedict/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cecelia Lynch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent visit of Benedict XVI to the U.S. demonstrates once again the uncanny ability of the most influential popes to embody the prospects as well as highlight the contradictions of the Roman Catholic Church in the world. The Pope's visit conversely afforded an opportunity for U.S. Catholics, other people of faith, and the media to project onto Benedict their hopes and fears regarding the Church's global role as a moral leader in public life. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/13/being-benedict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A progressive evangelical movement?</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/02/a-progressive-evangelical-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/02/a-progressive-evangelical-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Sager</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people hear the words "progressive" and "evangelical" together, a sort of cognitive dissonance occurs. Meshing the notions of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson with ideas of social justice is not something most people easily understand. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/05/02/a-progressive-evangelical-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An indifferent pope?</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/25/an-indifferent-pope/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/25/an-indifferent-pope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Appleby</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How far has the Catholic Church traveled in its almost 43 years as an advocate of religious freedom? Apparently, the journey has brought the Vatican to the brink of allying itself, however cautiously, with all believers whose search for the Truth of God has led them, or may be leading them, to endorse human dignity and human freedom as the basis for world order and cross-cultural, transnational peace.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/25/an-indifferent-pope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush, Benedict, and freedom as God’s gift</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/22/bush-benedict-and-freedom-as-gods-gift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/22/bush-benedict-and-freedom-as-gods-gift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Banchoff</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["During their meeting, the Holy Father and the President discussed a number of topics of common interest to the Holy See and the United States of America, including moral and religious considerations to which both parties are committed..." The United States committed to "moral <em>and religious</em> considerations"? Considerations shared with a particular religious organization, the Roman Catholic Church? This was news, or seemed to be. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/22/bush-benedict-and-freedom-as-gods-gift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s reductionist moment</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/20/obamas-reductionist-moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/20/obamas-reductionist-moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Schmalzbauer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his ill-chosen remarks to an April 6, 2008 San Francisco fundraiser, Barack Obama showed the danger bad social science poses to progressive politics.  Commenting on jobless communities in rural America, Obama argued that "they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." As an Obama supporter and a sociologist, I was disappointed to see my candidate draw on an outdated and reductionist approach to religion and culture. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/20/obamas-reductionist-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Trust me”</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/18/trust-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/18/trust-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Penny Edgell</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; American politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Sunday evening at Messiah College, the two contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination agreed to talk in a “deeply personal” way about “issues of faith and compassion and how a president’s faith can affect us all.” [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/04/18/trust-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
