<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Immanent Frame &#187; Religion &amp; higher education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/category/religion-higher-education/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame</link>
	<description>Secularism, religion, and the public sphere</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Beyond The God Delusion</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/23/beyond-the-god-delusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/23/beyond-the-god-delusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elaine Howard Ecklund</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; higher education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/23/beyond-the-god-delusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The university classroom has become a battleground in the science and religion wars.  In a controversial 2005 <a title="State of the University Address" href="http://www.cornell.edu/president/announcement_2005_1021.cfm" target="_blank">state of the university address</a> Cornell University President Hunter Rawlings stated, "Religiously-based opposition to evolution . . . raises profound questions about . . . what we teach in universities and it has a profound effect on public policy." The growing controversy over the role of religion in higher education led me to ask how top university scientists think they ought to respond to religiously based challenges to science. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/23/beyond-the-god-delusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion&#8217;s return</title>
		<link>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/16/religions-return/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/16/religions-return/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Schmalzbauer</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Religion &amp; higher education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/16/religions-return/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Immanent Frame</em> symbolizes a sea-change in American higher education. When I was in graduate school in the early 1990s, I don’t recall the SSRC taking a special interest in the academic study of religion. Today a visitor to the SSRC webpage is confronted with an entire program area on “<a title="Religion and the Public Sphere" href="http://programs.ssrc.org/religion/" target="_blank">Religion and the Public Sphere</a>,” with links to such topics as “Religion and International Affairs” and “The Religious Engagements of American Undergraduates.” Far from a marginal area at the SSRC, such initiatives have attracted the involvement of such world-class scholars as <a title="Talal Asad" href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/author/asad/">Talal Asad</a> and <a title="Robert Bellah" href="http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/author/bellah/">Robert Bellah</a>. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2008/02/16/religions-return/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
