Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research

In-depth interviewing is a promising method. Alas, traditional in-depth interview sample designs prohibit generalizing. Yet, after acknowledging this limitation, in-depth interview studies generalize anyway. Generalization appears unavoidable; thus, sample design must be grounded in plausible ontological and epistemological assumptions that enable generalization. Many in-depth interviewers reject such designs. The paper demonstrates that traditional sampling for in-depth interview studies is indefensible given plausible ontological conditions, and engages the epistemological claims that purportedly justify traditional sampling. The paper finds that the promise of in-depth interviewing will go unrealized unless interviewers adopt ontologically plausible sample designs. Otherwise, in-depth interviewing can only provide existence proofs, at best.

Published: Springer Publications

On the web: Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research

Citation: "Beyond the existence proof: ontological conditions, epistemological implications, and in-depth interview research," Quality & Quantity, Lucas, Samuel R., , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-012-9775-3.