Although the past decade has witnessed a resurgence of interest in questions of human trafficking, intimate labor, and the feminization of migration, few scholars have positioned the intimate lives of laborers at the center of analysis. This workshop proposes to address this gap in our understanding of the intersections of family, kinship, and the intimate choices of those working in the sphere of intimate labor. Rather than focusing on the labor performed by intimate laborers, we focus instead on the intimate lives of intimate laborers, exploring ways in which their ideas of intimacy, family, kinship, and love are both affected by and affect their migratory labor. In this workshop, we propose to bring together a group of scholars writing about various types of intimate laborers (including domestic workers, nannies, care givers, beauticians, and sex workers) who have migrated across Asia as well as their employers. Admission is free and open to the public. To sign up, please email us at ssrcABE@gol.com with your name, affiliation and telephone number.
While most industrialized countries societies experienced post-industrial revolution demographic transitions spanning a century or more, Japan transformed from a high-fertility to a low-fertility society in just one generation. Through a comparison of the different actors, ideas, institutions, and contexts in each era, Dr. Haig will discuss what Japan's past experience in promoting smaller families tells us about current efforts to promote larger ones.
Net neutrality became a major issue in the United States in 2007 when Comcast was revealed to have “blocked” the Bit Torrent traffic, which resulted in a number of legal challenges in the courts, and calls for government action. Since then, net neutrality has continued to be a hot issue for policy discussions in the U.S. There have also been extensive debates in the European Union over net neutrality, which will orientate future regulations for telecommunications. Despite the heated nature of these debates, almost no discussion of the issue has taken place in Japan. However, since the Internet involves global flows of information, Japan cannot continue to ignore this important issue. During the World Conference on International Telecommunications in Dubai, December 2012, participant countries were severely divided in their opinions over the question of how best to govern the Internet. The division originated from their views of who should bear the costs of infrastructure investment, which is closely related to network neutrality. This question is of crucial interest to both developed and developing countries. The book, which will be the subject of this presentation, addresses questions related to the sound development of the broadband market, what we should expect from a regulatory system, and efforts to evaluate the quality of Internet experience.
The Social Science Research Council and the Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership will be co-hosting a talk on Sept. 10th, by Prof. Narushige Michishita (2006 Abe Fellow) entitled “The History of North Korea’s Brinkmanship Diplomacy 1966-2012”. The talk will be held in Japanese, but Prof. Miyazaki will be able to answer questions in both English and Japanese.
The Social Science Research Council and the Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership will be co-hosting a talk on August 5th, by Prof. Hirokazu Miyazaki (1998 Abe Fellow) entitled “Arbitraging Japan: Dreams of Capitalism at the End of Finance”. The talk will be held in Japanese, but Prof. Miyazaki will be able to answer questions in both English and Japanese. Speaker : Hirokazu Miyazaki Professor of Anthropology and Director of the East Asia Program Cornell University/ Abe Fellow (1998) Moderator: Naoki Kamiyama Head of Japan Equity Strategy, Global Research, Merrill Lynch Japan Securities Co., Ltd. When? August 5th 2013, From 6PM to 8PM Notes: The presentation will be in Japanese. Admission is free. If interested, please RSVP to ssrcABE@gol.com.
Dr. Nemoto specializes in gender, work, family, and organizations in Japan and the United States. She received her PhD in Sociology from University of Texas-Austin in 2004. Her publications include: "When Culture Resists Progress: Masculine Organizational Culture and Its Impacts on the Vertical Segregation of Women in Japanese Companies" in Work, Employment & Society (2012), and “Never-Married Employed Men’s Gender Beliefs and Ambivalence Toward Matrimony in Japan” in Journal of Family Issues (forthcoming). Her Abe research project is “Comparative Study of Workplace Equality in a Japanese Multinational Firm in Japan, the United States, and China”.
Prof. Ikegami will examine the apparent paradox between the US deterrence doctrine and its pledge for nuclear disarmament in East Asia, a region threatened by proliferation of nuclear and conventional weapons. The nuclear doctrine of the United States, as elaborated in a variety of measures and documents including Obama’s general address in Prague in 2009, the Nuclear Posture Review of 2010 and the New START Treaty of the same year, clearly called for a reduction of the role of nuclear weapons and were seen as a concrete step towards nuclear disarmament. In East Asia, however, North Korea’s detonations of nuclear devices and launches of long range missiles in recent years made it clear that they now possess nuclear weapons. At the same time, the military expansionism of China in the Asia-Pacific region is shaking American hegemony in the region. Contemporary Japan, within range of PRC and DPRK’s ballistic and long-range cruise missiles, has seen its relations with China shaken by the Senkaku Islands problem, reflected in a rise in military tensions across Asia. In response to these problems, voices casting doubts on the effectiveness of the US nuclear umbrella and nuclear deterrence strategies are growing stronger in both Japan and South Korea. Though still a minority, some people have started to argue for nuclear sharing similar to the European NATO model, redeployment of US nuclear assets and independent development of nuclear capability to improve the reliability of nuclear deterrence. If the US were to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in its security doctrine, it might push Japan and South Korea to pursue independent development of nuclear weapons. Prof. Ikegami will examine the apparent paradox between the US deterrence doctrine and its pledge for nuclear disarmament in East Asia, a region threatened by proliferation of nuclear and conventional weapons.