BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Social Science Research Council (SSRC) - ECPv6.17.0//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Social Science Research Council (SSRC)
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.ssrc.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Social Science Research Council (SSRC)
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20090308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20091101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20100314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20101107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20110313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20111106T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20101208T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20101210T170000
DTSTAMP:20201028T155202Z
CREATED:20201028T155202Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201028T155202Z
UID:10000627-1291795200-1292000400@www.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:Reproduction Mobility in Asia
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Directors\nBiao Xiang\nUniversity of Oxford\nbiao.xiang@compas.ox.ac.uk \nMika Toyota\nNational University of Singapore\nmikatoyota@nus.edu.sg \nWorkshop Participants\nSneha Banerjee\, M.Phil Student\, Centre for International Politics\, Organization and Disarmament (CIPOD)\, School of International Studies Jawahaharlal Nehru University\n“Globalization and Women’s Remunerative Word: the Curious Case of Commercial Surrogacy in India” \nSara Friedman\, Associate Professor\, Anthropology and Gender Studies\, Indiana University\n“Reproducing the Taiwanese Nation: Population Anxieties in an Age of Marital Migration” \nZeynep Gürtin-Broadbent\, Research Fellow and Ph.D. Student\, Centre for Family Research\, University of Cambridge\n“Conceiving the Nation: Reproductive Migration and the Negotiation of Trans/nationalism in Turkey” \nMarcia C. Inhorn\, William K. Lanman Jr. Professor of Anthropology and International Affairs in the Department of Anthropology and The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University and Chair\, Council on Middle East Studies\, Yale University\n“Reproductive Exile in Global Dubai: Stories from South Asia” \nOlivia Killias\, Ph.D. Candidate\, Institute for Social Anthropology\, University of Bern\n“The Making of ‘Quality Maids’: Managing Reproduction Migration between Indonesia and Malaysia” \nAra Wilson\, Associate Professor\, Women’s Studies and Cultural Anthropology and Director of the program in the study of sexualities\, Duke University\n“Inter-Asian Medicine\, National Economies\, And Transnational Embodiments” \nCall for Workshop Papers\nThe rise of “reproduction migration”-movements of people for the purpose of maintaining and reproducing people on a daily and generational basis-is a significant social development in Asia\, especially after the 1997 financial crisis. In many parts of the region\, international migrations for marriage\, the provision as well as the receipt of care\, and education are increasing faster than conventional labor mobility. Built on a wide-range of existent but largely discrete case studies\, this workshop seeks integrative frameworks in order to theorize the migrations of care workers\, domestic maids\, students\, spouses\, entertainers\, medical tourists and others. The concept of “social reproduction”-how society is organized structurally and over time surrounding the everyday production of life-will be central to our discussion. While the notion of social reproduction has a long history\, our discussion will be informed by two specific new developments. First\, the rise of “anthropogenetic capitalism” that concerns how men produce men\, instead of how men produce goods\, as evidenced by the fact that health care\, education and entertainment are among the fastest growing industries\, brings social reproduction to the core of the economy. Second\, the processes of social reproduction are transnationalized with increasing reproduction migration. Thus\, the distinctions between the productive and the reproductive\, and between the national and the transnational\, are profoundly blurred. \nThe workshop will focus\, by no means exclusively\, on the following sets of questions: \n\nFirst\, how should we understand the increase of reproduction migration in the context of crises in conventional material accumulation (e.g. 1997\, 2008\, and numerous other local crises)? How does reproduction migration enable the commodification of social reproduction and at the same time exacerbate the moral anxiety about it?\nSecond\, what is the relationship between reproduction migration and the nation-state? Reproduction migration helps sustain national social reproduction\, but is also seen as disruptive of established patterns and ideologies of reproduction. For example\, how are international marriages facilitated and regulated to reconcile this tension? What are the implications of student migration on education institutions’ function as a reproducer of the national culture?\nThird\, how should we rethink about gender\, social difference and intimate labor? Reproduction migration brings people of different categories into intimate contacts. Why do employers prefer migrants who are supposedly different from themselves\, often in primordial terms\, for providing intimate labor? How are difference and intimacy transmuted to each other? Why does women’s reproductive labor have to be “denaturalized” (by looking after non-relatives) in order to be socially valued\, while “natural” intimate labor remains morally desirable?\n\nThe prospective participants must have worked on reproduction migration empirically and the paper must be conceptually oriented towards the notion of social reproduction. We especially welcome contributions that integrate ethnographic investigation into political economy analysis. The workshop will also reflect on general strategies of theorization in social research in Asia.
URL:https://www.ssrc.org/events/reproduction-mobility-in-asia/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/30-56d73ad53c7d5.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20101208T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20101210T170000
DTSTAMP:20201028T155020Z
CREATED:20201028T155020Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201028T155020Z
UID:10000624-1291795200-1292000400@www.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:Regional Knowledge Hubs in Asia: the Social Sciences and Humanities in Science and Technology Human Capital (STHC)
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Directors\nV.V. Krishna\nNational University of Singapore\narivvk@nus.edu.sg \nTim Turpin\nUniversity of Western Sydney\nt.turpin@uws.edu.au \nWorkshop Participants\nMohan V. Avvari\, Associate Professor\, Business School\, University of Nottingham – Malaysia Campus; Isshamuddin Ismail (in absentia)\, General Manager of Strategic Planning with Pahang BioScience\, Kuala Lumpur; and K. Thiruchelvam (in absentia)\, Associate Professor and Head of the Department of Science and Technology Studies at the Faculty of Science\, University of Malaya\n“Inter-Organisational Networks emerging in a Greenfield Cluster – A Study in Malaysia’s Multimedia Super Corridor Cluster” \nChuanxing Wang\, Associate Professor School of Political Science and International Relations and Vice Director of Center for America Studies\, Tongji University\n“The Structural Power Based on Innovation Systems and the Comeback of East Asia” \nSam Garrett-Jones\, Associate Professor and Acting Head of School (Management)\, School of Management and Marketing\, University of Wollongong\n“The Role of Collective Learning in the Development of Innovative Local Organizations and Regions” \nMei-Chih Hu\, Associate Professor\, Institute of Technology Management\, National Tsing Hua University\n“Knowledge Flows in Taiwan’s Hsinchu Regional Innovation System” \nKathryn Ibata-Arens\, Associate Professor\, Department of Political Science\, DePaul University\n“University Incubators as Hubs of Innovative Ecosystems: Bamboo Networks and Best Practice in Start-Up Business Incubation Management” \nSangeeta Kamat\, Associate Professor\, Education Policy Studies/International Education\, University of Massachusetts at Amherst\n“Neoliberalism\, Urbanism and the Competition State: Producing Hyderabad as a ‘knowledge city’” \nTae-Ho Kim\, D. Kim Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow for History of Science and Technology in East Asia\, Center for Korean Research and Weatherhead East Asian Institute\, Columbia University\n“A Tale of Two Cities: Comparison of Two Industrial Knowledge Hubs in 1960s’ North and 1980s’ South Korea” \nBalaji Parthasarathy\, Associate Professor\, International Institute of Information Technology\, Bangalore\n“The Emergence and Transformation of Bangalore\, India\, as a ‘Knowledge Hub’” \nNaubahar Sharif\, Assistant Professor\, Division of Social Science\, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Erik Baark (in absentia)\, Professor of Social Science and Environment\, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology\n“From trade hub to knowledge hub: The role of Hong Kong’s innovation system in linking southern China to global markets” \nMark Wilson\, Associate Director\, School of Planning\, Design and Construction and Professor of Urban and Regional Planning\, Michigan State University and Kenneth E. Corey (in absentia)\, Professor\, Department of Geography\, Michigan State University\n“Planning and Policy Action for Knowledge Hubs in Asia” \nCall for Workshop Papers\nGlobal competitiveness is dependent on the capacity of economies to acquire knowledge capital and to apply new knowledge through a highly trained and specialised workforce. The term ‘knowledge-based’ or ‘learning economy’ has emerged to describe those economies in which the production\, distribution and use of knowledge are the main drivers of growth\, wealth creation and employment across all industrial sectors. The concept of a knowledge-based economy has sometimes been used to make a contrast between so called ‘new’ economies based on new technologies\, from ‘old’ economies based on long established products and process. \nHowever\, a knowledge-based economy is not simply one that emphasises new technologies or even new knowledge. A knowledge-based economy is one in which all sectors are knowledge intensive\, are responsive to new ideas and technological change\, are innovative\, and employ highly skilled personnel engaged in on-going learning. In short\, knowledge and skills have to be useable and used in the production of all manner of goods and services. \nOur conceptualization of a knowledge hub is that it comprises an ensemble of knowledge-intensive organisations located in both public and private sectors. Some are research-intensive knowledge producers\, such as research institutes or universities. Others are demanding knowledge users\, including firms but also service providers such as hospitals. The knowledge-users provide a focus for knowledge-generation\, transmission and diffusion. Producers and users are closely connected and\, while spatial proximity is important\, they do not have to be physically co-located. Moreover\, because of their social and economic characteristics\, knowledge hubs draw on the social sciences and humanities in the course of their development. \nKnowledge hubs have three key functions. They generate new basic knowledge of relevance to many industries\, both old and new. The impact of this knowledge is not necessarily direct\, nor immediate. But it is influential. In addition\, they also generate applied knowledge that is directly and immediately relevant to local industries. Secondly\, knowledge hubs capture (and participate in creating) knowledge generated elsewhere\, nationally or internationally\, and develop this further to meet specific local needs. A third function is to transmit knowledge through educational institutions such as universities and schools but also through life-long learning processing that involve firms\, community based institutions and a variety of government agencies and services including hospitals\, clinics and professional associations. \nWith the rapid economic development of the Chinese and Indian economies and the growth of the newly industrialized Asia economies\, there is evidence of newly emerging knowledge hubs across the Asia region. In some cases these are concentrated in specific fields such as biotechnology or ICT in Singapore. In others there is evidence of a relocation of existing knowledge hubs in areas such as mining technologies moving from North America to Australia and South Africa. However\, we understand very little about the dynamics behind this process\, or the way different disciplines\, especially the social sciences and humanities\, intersect through the process and the implications for national innovation systems. \nThis gives rise to four key questions to be addressed by the workshop. (1)Does the movement of science and technology human capital precede or follow such developments? (2.) What is the role of social science and humanities researchers in STHC? (3) How important is the local availability of personnel in anchoring a newly emerging knowledge hub? (4) What are the institutional imperatives for supporting such development? (and (5) in what ways are newly emerging hubs remaining linked to other global centres of knowledge?
URL:https://www.ssrc.org/events/regional-knowledge-hubs-in-asia-the-social-sciences-and-humanities-in-science-and-technology-human-capital-sthc/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/30-56d73ad53c7d5.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20101208T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20101210T170000
DTSTAMP:20201028T154814Z
CREATED:20201028T154814Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201028T154814Z
UID:10000623-1291795200-1292000400@www.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:Old Histories\, New Geographies: Contrapuntal Mobilities of Trade and State across Asia
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Directors\nEngseng Ho\nDuke University\nengseng.ho@duke.edu \nLakshmi Subramanian\nJamia Millia Islamia\nnilgiri98@gmail.com \nWorkshop Participants\nJacqueline Armijo\, Associate Professor\, Department of International Affairs\, Qatar University\n“Silk Roads Redux: The Social\, Economic\, and Political Implications of the Revival of China – Gulf Trade Relations” \nSurajit Chakravarty\, Urban Planning Faculty\, Al Hosn University\n“Insurgence of another kind: Practiced Citizenship as Inverted Resistance” \nKubanychbek Chymbaev\, Senior Lecturer\, Oriental Studies and International Relations\, Bishkek Humanities University\n“Trade as a Political and Economic Resource of Kyrgyzstan” \nMax Hirsh\, Ph.D. Candidate\, Architecture and Urban Planning\, Harvard University\n“Airport Urbanism: Mapping Mobility in the Pearl River Delta” \nWilson Chacko Jacob\, Assistant Professor of History\, Concordia University\n“Of Angels and Men: Sayyid Fadl bin Alawi and the Form-of-Life” \nLamia Karim\, Associate Professor\, Department of Anthropology\, University of Oregon – Eugene and Manzurul Mannan\, Assistant Professor\, Department of Liberal Arts and Social Studies\, Independent University\, Bangladesh (IUB)\n“The New Silk Road: Perspectives on the Asian Highway from Bangladesh” \nSimon Layton\, Ph.D. Candidate\, St. Catharine’s College\, Faculty of History\, University of Cambridge\n“Suppressing ‘the Gift of Krishna’: India\, Piracy\, and the Littoral Politics of Empire” \nJason Lim\, Lecturer\, School of History and Politics at the University of Wollongong\n“Vicissitudes of the China Trade for the Chinese Merchants in Malaya and Singapore\, 1912-1982” \nNisha Mary Mathew\, Mellon Doctoral Fellow\, Centre for Indian Studies in Africa (CISA)\, University of Witwatersrand\n“New Geopolitical Imaginaries in South India: Contributions of the Gold Trade\, Gulf Migration and Liberalization” \nCall for Workshop Papers\nThis workshop aims to foster dialogue between past connections and contemporary ones which are changing the social shape of Asia. We seek to plumb the historical resonances that lend excitement and confidence (and at times concern) to new exchanges with old acquaintances across Asia. Such dialogue necessarily revisits the idea of the region\, one of the most vibrant areas of study to emerge in recent years. If imperialism created new geographies and indeed new histories\, recent global currents are reworking older regional connections and generating new relationships. We invite papers which study historical or contemporary inter-Asian exchanges\, or that reflect on both. \nThe different ways in which business/labour and government interact provide a rich empirical base and theoretical frame for thinking about how such new connections are reshaping Asia. While the British empire provided a common administrative and security frame for new connections across the Indian Ocean\, the connections being remade across Asia today do not share such a common frame. States often lag behind their mobile citizens: labour-exporting Philippines\, Indonesia and India are challenged to construct inter-governmental labour regulations with their counterparts in Saudi Arabia/the Persian Gulf and Malaysia/Singapore. In industry\, chip foundry makers of Taiwan have completely relocated to the PRC despite a lack of diplomatic and regulatory protections agreed between their governments. How are labour and capital able to make such leaps out of their national spaces\, where they have little recourse to national rights and legal protection? In other ways\, states are being entrepreneurial ahead of their populations. Saudi King Abdullah headed east—to China\, India\, Malaysia\, Pakistan rather than Washington—on his inaugural overseas trip\, with businessmen and women and tow; Singapore’s foreign minister in turn went west in a historic first visit to Yemen\, with businessmen and Singaporean members of the Yemeni diaspora in tow. Across Eurasia\, former Soviet bloc states delicately renegotiate their mutual relations as oil pipelines snake across new borders\, while their Central Asian subjects seek new silk routes of trade as soviet industrial jobs disappear. \nThe concrete social shapes of these new exchanges seldom correspond to globalization’s classic liberal conditions of free-flowing trade and finance\, alienable property and legal protection for foreigners. Instead\, they subsist on a broader range of social relations. We invite papers that explore what these broader relations look like. Such a paper might be one that examines old associations like Chinese lineage temples\, once stigmatized under communist rule\, but now revivified in bringing together clansmen who are national communist party officials\, local landholders\, and overseas Chinese investors\, to transform paddy fields into export zones. Others may look at ways in which older connections—of culture\, language\, education\, kinship\, religion\, trade—are being reworked to engage with more contemporary concerns of circulation in South and Southeast Asia. Yet others may attempt new theorizations of space that offer very new challenges to notions of entitlement and citizenship. Such concerns may help break the older limits of regions be it Asia or Eurasia\, and allow us to ask whether new modalities of circulation of capital and labour are being created\, that will drive the reconfiguration of the regions. \nThrough the papers and discussion\, we plan to collectively theorize how long distance connections based on reciprocal ritual and economic transactions\, and their retrospective reflections\, may be producing new\, expanded notions of space and subjectivity\, reprising older ones\, or transforming them. We hope to understand how such spaces and subjectivities interpenetrate with those of national and transnational states\, and their constituent categories of citizenship and subject-hood.
URL:https://www.ssrc.org/events/old-histories-new-geographies-contrapuntal-mobilities-of-trade-and-state-across-asia/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/30-56d73ad53c7d5.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20101208T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20101210T170000
DTSTAMP:20201028T153355Z
CREATED:20201028T153355Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201028T153355Z
UID:10000620-1291795200-1292000400@www.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:Inter-Asian temple and trust networks within and out of Southeast Asia
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Directors\nKenneth Dean\nEast Asian Studies\, McGill University\nkenneth.dean@mcgill.ca \nWorkshop Participants\nChi-cheung Choi\, Professor\, History Department\, The Chinese University of Hong Kong\n“Between Ancestor and Ghost: Grand Universal Salvation Rituals (Wan Yuan sheng Hui) in South East Asia” \nJean DeBernardi\, Professor of Anthropology\, University of Alberta\n“Spirit Mediums\, Local History\, and Daoist Networks” \nC. Julia Huang\, Associate Professor\, Institute of Anthropology\, National Tsing Hua University; Visiting Senior Research Fellow\, Asia Research Institute\, National University of Singapore\n“Buddhism and its Trust Networks between Taiwan\, Malaysia\, and the United States” \nHui Kian Kwee\, Assistant Professor\, Department of History\, University of Toronto\n“Sanction through Divinity: the Chinese Council (gongtang) and Guanyinting Temple in Batavia\, 1780s-1870s” \nHilary Lim\, Principal Lecturer in Law\, School of Law\, University of East London and Raj Brown\, Emeritus Professor in International Business\, Royal Holloway College\, London\n“Flying Money: Legal Pluralism\, the Cash Waqf and the Tong” \nThien-Huong Ninh\, Ph.D. Candidate\, Sociology\, University of Southern California\n“Roots\, Ruptures\, and Renovations: Transnational and Homeland Ties Between Caodai Temples in Cambodia and Vietnam” \nPrista Ratanapruck\, Assistant Professor of Anthropology\, University of Virginia\n“Gompa: Tibetan Buddhist Monastery and Manangi Trade Networks in South and Southeast Asia” \nJeffrey Samuels\, Associate Professor\, Department of Philosophy and Religion\, and Coordinator of Asian Studies\, Western Kentucky University\n“Buddhist Temple Networks Across the Indian Ocean: Capital\, Resources\, and Minority Identity Formation” \nVineeta Sinha\, Associate Professor\, Department of Sociology\, National University of Singapore\n“Producing and Sustaining Agamic-Style Hindu Temples in Singapore” \nCall for Workshop Papers\nAlthough considerable empirical research has been done on Southeast Asian trading networks\, so far less attention has focused on the role of Chinese and Indian temples and Islamic institutions in fostering\, facilitating\, and shaping the flow of people\, capital\, and cultural resources within these trust networks. With some notable exceptions\, so far there has been little examination of the historical role of these temples and community networks in the spread of the Chinese\, Indian\, and Islamic communities into Southeast Asia. Nor has their current role in reviving connections between Overseas Chinese\, Indian\, and Islamic communities\, and their ancestral temples\, communities\, and holy sites in China\, India\, and the Middle East been explored. \nThe study of these intricate\, overlapping networks is one way to prevent local history from falling into the trap of endless recuperation by national history. In that model\, local history can be nothing more than an endless series of minor variations on a theme\, with the underlying issue being the process of cultural unification of the locale with the state. A focus on trans-national\, and even global networks\, works against the prevalent model of hierarchical encompassment and state control of local society by introducing multiple planes of reference\, alternative and transversal sources of cultural invention and investment\, and the possibility of local cultural self-definition drawing creatively from multiple sources. \nStudy of the historical development and recent renewal of these networks—whether through ritual or other socio-cultural processes—should reveal essential aspects of the process of globalization and its impact on specific locales. This workshop will raise important questions about the ability of local cultures to negotiate the forces of capitalism\, ethnic identity and cultural nationalism sweeping through Asia today. For instance\, ritual practices among Chinese networks show extraordinary versatility and flexibility in creatively engaging with these forces without losing relevance to their participants. This in turn raises broader questions about the impact of modernity on contemporary Asia and the value of theories of alternative modernity for the study of these developments. \nThis workshop will examine and compare a number of specific temple networks or parallel trust networks that operate within and out of Southeast Asia. Papers will trace the spread of specific cults of regional deities and particular ritual practices (local Daoist traditions\, collective spirit medium training and group trance dance) out of China\, across Southeast Asia into Malaysia\, Singapore\, Indonesia\, and into a wider inter-Asian region\, where they often evolved new ritual forms. We will also explore the return flow of ritual knowledge and economic support within these networks during the massive revival of popular religion in Southeast China over the past 30 years. Papers will be presented on Islamic trust networks and networks of Indian temples and their links to trade and other cultural networks. The workshop can also showcase new technologies for the mapping and analysis of religious networks (GIS and spatial network analysis). Case studies of specific sites (Malacca\, Penang\, Singapore\, Semarang\, Kuching\, etc.) will examine the complex interactions between different temple communities\, and their interactions with other ethnic and religious communities.
URL:https://www.ssrc.org/events/inter-asian-temple-and-trust-networks-within-and-out-of-southeast-asia/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/30-56d73ad53c7d5.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20101208T080000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20101210T170000
DTSTAMP:20201028T153059Z
CREATED:20201028T153059Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201028T153059Z
UID:10000619-1291795200-1292000400@www.ssrc.org
SUMMARY:How Asia Became Territorial
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Directors\nItty Abraham\nUniversity of Texas at Austin\nittya@austin.utexas.edu \nSee Seng Tan\nS. Rajaratnam School of International Studies\, Nanyang Technological University\nissstan@ntu.edu.sg \nWorkshop Participants\nCarolyn Cartier\, Professor of Human Geography and China Studies\, China Research Centre\, University of Technology\, Sydney\n“Regional Governmentalities or Territorializaton with/out Boundaries” \nMichele Ford\, Chair\, Department of Indonesian Studies\, University of Sydney and Lenore Lyons (in absentia)\, Research Professor in Asian Studies at the University of Western Australia\n“Sovereignty\, territory and citizenship: The production of subaltern cosmopolitans in Indonesia’s maritime borderlands” \nSiba N. Grovogui\, Professor Department of Political Science\, The Johns Hopkins University and Hitomi Koyama\, Ph.D. candidate\, The John Hopkins University\n“Continental Drifts: Imperial Cartography\, Sovereignty\, and Postcolonial Conflicts” \nTuran Kayoaglu\, Professor\, Department of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences at the University of Washington\, Tacoma\n“How Asia Ended Extraterritoriality” \nL. H. M. Ling\, Associate Professor\, Graduate Program in International Affairs\, The New School\n“‘ASIA IS A WOMAN’: Episteme and Territorialization” \nDavid Ludden\, Professor of Political Economy and Globalization in the History Department\, New York University\n“Uneven Development\, Spatial Inequity\, and Territorial Politics: Remapping 1905 in Bengal and Assam” \nKen MacLean\, Assistant Professor of International Development and Social Change (IDSC)\, Clark University\n“The Cultural Politics of Lines: Performing Sovereignty in the Greater South China/ Eastern Sea” \nTorsten Weber\, Research Associate\, History Department\, School of Social Sciences and Humanities\, Jacobs University Bremen\n“Utopias of ‘One Asia’: Visual Portrayals of ‘Asia’ in the Age of Nationalism” \nCall for Workshop Papers\nAsia today has more inter-state disputes over territory than any other continent in the world. The majority of its states—Japan\, Korea\, China\, Taiwan\, Philippines\, Vietnam\, Indonesia\, Malaysia\, Cambodia\, Thailand\, Pakistan\, India\, Bangladesh\, Afghanistan\, etc.—find themselves embroiled in deeply contentious and long-standing disputes with neighbors and others over bits of land and/or in the maritime domain. What is most alarming is that these disputes are not merely historical legacies of imperial cartography that can be resolved in the well-tempered meeting rooms of international diplomacy. Struggles over disputed lands repeatedly generate the nationalist ire of domestic Asian populations\, fuelled further by nostalgia for some idealized past\, frustrated economic and political aspirations\, and tensions between the competing yet symbiotic dynamics of globalization and nationalism. Subaltern histories and armed insurgencies seeking self-determination may complicate further the fray of disputed official histories. The net effect is to create a situation where the most likely cause of inter-state conflict in Asia today is a situation emanating from a territorial dispute. However\, we believe that these very practical concerns cannot be fully understood unless scholars look beyond territorial disputes per se. \nTerritorial disputes raise questions of history\, historiography\, conquest\, colonization\, legitimacy\, legality\, nations\, nationalism\, boundaries and borders—issues that invite interrogation by critically minded political scientists\, geographers\, international legal scholars\, historians\, and anthropologists. Disputes\, however\, are not our primary interest. Rather\, this workshop proposes to examine critically the foundational relation underlying disputes\, namely\, the self-reinforcing equivalence between “state” and “territory” that is the unquestioned condition of modern sovereignty. \nAmong the questions we would like to see raised are historical concerns—when and how did the state-territory equivalence emerge in Asia; How are “geo-bodies” (Winichakul 1994) constructed in different Asian countries—as well as theoretical\, spatial\, cultural\, and political issues: How are multiple territorial sovereignties understood\, represented\, contested\, and resolved; How did/do ideas of territory travel within and beyond Asia; What were/are the technologies of territorial sovereignty; how and where do “zomias” (van Schendel 2005)\, SEZ’s\, and utopias emerge; What does state-and-territory do to borderlanders; How can we conceptualize the many relations between territory and citizenship\, involving diasporas\, foreigners\, sojourners\, strangers\, exiles\, minorities\, fifth columnists\, and aliens; How are “real” and “virtual” maps imagined\, produced\, and deconstructed through popular culture and everyday life? \nThe objective of this proposed workshop is an inter-disciplinary discussion that leads to the untangling of the dense historical\, ideological\, and political relations that made Asia territorial.
URL:https://www.ssrc.org/events/how-asia-became-territorial/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.ssrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/30-56d73ad53c7d5.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR