Frontiers in Social Science features new research in the flagship journals of the Social Science Research Council’s founding disciplinary associations. Every month we publish a new selection of articles from the most recent issues of these journals, marking the rapid advance of the frontiers of social and behavioral science.

Benefits of the online gig economy

Online platforms for short-term remote work that do not have to comply with traditional employment regulations benefit all market participants, and especially workers. 

Author(s)
Christopher T. Stanton and Catherine Thomas
Journal
American Economic Review
Citation
Stanton, Christopher T., and Catherine Thomas. 2025. "Who Benefits from Online Gig Economy Platforms?" American Economic Review 115 (6): 1857–95. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20221189 Copy
Abstract

Online labor platforms for short-term remote work have many more job seekers than available jobs. Despite their relative abundance, workers capture a substantial share of the surplus from transactions. We draw this conclusion from demand estimates that imply workers' wages include significant markups over costs and a survey that validates our surplus estimates. Workers retain a significant share of the surplus because demand-side search frictions and worker differentiation reduce direct competition. Finally, we show that applying traditional employment regulations to online gig economy platforms would lower job posting and hiring rates, reducing aggregate surplus for all market participants, including workers.

Knowledge deficits in local policymakers

A survey of small town politicians in India finds that local government officials lack procedural knowledge on how to govern.

Author(s)
Adam Michael Auerbach, Shikhar Singh, and Tariq Thachil
Journal
American Political Science Review
Citation
AUERBACH, ADAM MICHAEL, SHIKHAR SINGH, and TARIQ THACHIL. “Who Knows How to Govern? Procedural Knowledge in India’s Small-Town Councils.” American Political Science Review 119, no. 2 (2025): 708–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000297. Copy
Abstract

Governments across the Global South have decentralized a degree of power to municipal authorities. Are local officials sufficiently knowledgeable about how to execute their expanded portfolio of responsibilities? Past studies have focused on whether citizens lack the requisite information to hold local officials accountable. We instead draw on extensive fieldwork and a novel survey of small-town politicians in India to show that local officials themselves have distressingly low levels of procedural knowledge on how to govern. We further show that procedural knowledge shapes the capabilities of officials to represent their constituents and that asymmetries in knowledge may blunt the representative potential of these bodies. Finally, we show that winning office does not provide an institutionalized pathway to knowledge acquisition, highlighting the need for policy-based solutions. Our findings demonstrate the importance of assessing knowledge deficits among politicians, and not only citizens, to make local governance work.

Menu