Frontiers in Social Science features new research in the flagship journals of the Social Science Research Council’s founding disciplinary associations. Every month we publish a new selection of articles from the most recent issues of these journals, marking the rapid advance of the frontiers of social and behavioral science.

Understanding the gender gap in performance evaluations

In a series of experiments, evaluators form overly pessimistic beliefs about women’s performance due to failures of Bayesian updating.

Author(s)
Christine L. Exley and Kirby Nielsen
Journal
American Economic Review
Citation
Exley, Christine L., and Kirby Nielsen. 2024. "The Gender Gap in Confidence: Expected but Not Accounted For." American Economic Review, 114 (3): 851-85. Copy
Abstract

We investigate how the gender gap in confidence affects the views that evaluators (e.g., employers) hold about men and women. We find the confidence gap is contagious, causing evaluators to form overly pessimistic beliefs about women. This result arises even though the confidence gap is expected and even though the confidence gap shouldn't be contagious if evaluators are Bayesian. Only an intervention that facilitates Bayesian updating proves (somewhat) effective. Additional results highlight how similar findings follow even when there is no room for discriminatory motives or differences in priors because evaluators are asked about arbitrary, rather than gender-specific, groups.

The political costs of environmental policies

Owners of older cars banned from driving in Milan under an anti-pollution regulation were more likely to vote for a populist right party in subsequent elections.

Author(s)
Italo Colantone, Livio Di Lonardo, Yotam Margalit, And Marco Percoco
Journal
American Political Science Review
Citation
Colantone, Italo, Livio Di Lonardo, Yotam Margalit, And Marco Percoco. “The Political Consequences of Green Policies: Evidence from Italy.” American Political Science Review 118, no. 1 (2024): 108–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000308. Copy
Abstract

For many governments, enacting green policies is a priority, but such policies often impose on citizens substantial and uneven costs. How does the introduction of green policies affect voting? We study this question in the context of a major ban on polluting cars introduced in Milan, which was strongly opposed by the populist right party Lega. Using several inferential strategies, we show that owners of banned vehicles—who incurred a median loss of €3,750—were significantly more likely to vote for Lega in the subsequent elections. Our analysis indicates that this electoral change did not stem from a broader shift against environmentalism, but rather from disaffection with the policy’s uneven pocketbook implications. In line with this pattern, recipients of compensation from the local government were not more likely to switch to Lega. The findings highlight the central importance of distributive consequences in shaping the political ramifications of green policies.

Menu