Frontiers in Social Science features new research in the flagship journals of the Social Science Research Council’s founding disciplinary associations. Every month we publish a new selection of articles from the most recent issues of these journals, marking the rapid advance of the frontiers of social and behavioral science.

WWI battle deaths increased support for the Nazi party

Higher county-level fatality rates among German soldiers during WWI increased electoral support for right-wing nationalist parties.

Author(s)
Alexander De Juan, Felix Haass, Carlo Koos, Sascha Riaz and Thomas Tichelbaecker
Journal
American Political Science Review
Citation
DE JUAN, ALEXANDER, FELIX HAASS, CARLO KOOS, SASCHA RIAZ, and THOMAS TICHELBAECKER. “War and Nationalism: How WW1 Battle Deaths Fueled Civilians’ Support for the Nazi Party.” American Political Science Review 118, no. 1 (2024): 144–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542300014X. Copy
Abstract

Can wars breed nationalism? We argue that civilians’ indirect exposure to war fatalities can trigger psychological processes that increase identification with their nation and ultimately strengthen support for nationalist parties. We test this argument in the context of the rise of the Nazi Party after World War 1 (WW1). To measure localized war exposure, we machine-coded information on 7.5 million German soldiers who were wounded or died in WW1. Our empirical strategy leverages battlefield dynamics that cause plausibly exogenous variation in the county-level casualty fatality rate—the share of dead soldiers among all casualties. We find that throughout the interwar period, electoral support for right-wing nationalist parties, including the Nazi Party, was 2.6 percentage points higher in counties with above-median casualty fatality rates. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we find that this effect was driven by civilians rather than veterans and areas with a preexisting tradition of collective war commemoration.

Understanding inconsistent French citizenship declarations

Over a 30 year period, 19 percent of foreign-origin French census respondents switched to “French by birth” declarations at the next census, raising questions about the determinants of these reclassifications.

Author(s)
Louise Caron, Haley McAvay, and Mirna Safi
Journal
American Sociological Review
Citation
Caron, L., McAvay, H., & Safi, M. (2023). Born Again French: Explaining Inconsistency in Citizenship Declarations in French Longitudinal Data. American Sociological Review, 88(6), 1066-1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224231207392 Copy
Abstract

Citizenship is a fundamental boundary in contemporary societies that entails rights, a sense of belonging, and social status. Drawing on longitudinal census data, this article tracks individual changes in self-reported citizenship over 30 years in France. Respondents choose one of three categories: “French by birth,” “became French,” or “foreigner.” The first category should be stable over the life course: one is born, but cannot become, “French by birth.” Yet, our findings indicate that about 19 percent of foreign-origin respondents in a given census switch to “French by birth” declarations at the next census, in a process we call reclassification. Immigrant assimilation variables, such as nativity and length of stay, and events such as intermarriage, naturalization, and residential mobility, trigger reclassification. Yet reclassification is also higher among individuals with lower socioeconomic status and respondents of African and Southeast Asian origin, as well as those with origins in former French colonies. These findings suggest reclassification is a byproduct of immigrant assimilation, which triggers feelings of national identity, as well as status upgrading, whereby disadvantaged and discriminated groups change their citizenship declaration to compensate for low social status. Empirically novel, reclassification offers original theoretical insights into the meanings of citizenship, civic stratification, and boundary-crossing.

Menu