Abstract
A great deal of time and energy have been invested in fact-checking as a way of countering misinformation and false beliefs. Yet it remains unclear whether fact-checking actually decreases the influence of misinformation. Numerous lab-based and online experiments on fact-checking suggest that it can reduce belief in false claims. However, these studies examine the effects of fact-checks on individual-level cognition under artificial conditions. The dearth of population-level studies has left many important questions unanswered, and consequently, the efficacy of fact-checking in a real-world setting is still unclear. To fill this gap, this proposal aims to understand the efficacy of fact-checking at a societal level. We propose a study using historical Facebook and Twitter data that will examine four key research questions:
- In the days following the release of fact-checks, do shares of claims labeled false taper off on Facebook and Twitter?
- How are the effects of fact-checks on related claims mediated by sharer and sharer-friend ideology, region, and demographics?
- Does fact-checking affect the likelihood of a claim to recirculate?
- How does the distribution of Facebook user reactions to claims and fact-checks change over time, and do they interact?
Principal Investigators
Matthew Baum
Marvin Kalb Professor of Global Communications, Professor of Public Policy, Harvard University
Nicholas Beauchamp
Assistant Professor of Political Science, Northeastern University
Nic Dias
Researcher, Harvard University
Nir Grinberg
Postdoctoral Researcher, Northeastern University
Cameron Hickey
Technology Manager, Harvard University
David Lazer
Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University
Briony Swire-Thompson
Postdoctoral Researcher, Northeastern University