Article written by 2008 DPDF Urban Visual Studies Fellow and 2009 IDRF Fellow Mona Damluji, Arbella Bet-Shlimon, Alda Benjamen, Saleem Al-Bahloly, Haytham Bahoora, Caecilia Pieri, Bridget L. Guarasci, Zainab Saleh, and Peter Sluglett, featured in the Arab Studies Journal, Volume 23, No. 1:

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt:
Universities around the world were prime sites for the expression of popular opposition to the US invasion of Iraq. During the year prior to March 2003, students and scholars organized protests, teach-ins, and panels to voice the outcry against the hasty plans of the Bush regime to “liberate” the Iraqis. From its inception, Operation Iraqi Freedom suffered from a lack of historical and humanistic perspective.1 As distant witnesses to the violence and injustices televised nightly, many researchers living outside of Iraq hoped that Saddam Hussein’s fall would at least open up critical new avenues for research. During the thirteen years of brutal UN sanctions that preceded the war on Iraq, substantial ethnographic work, cultural studies, and historical research were exceedingly difficult if not impossible due to lack of access to people, places, archives, and information inside the country. Scholarship on Iraq in this period relied chiefly on British colonial archives and top-down political analysis.

Publication Details

Title
Roundtable Perspectives: Researching Iraq Today
Authors
Damluji, Mona
Publisher
Arab Studies Institute
Publish Date
November 2015
Citation
Damluji, Mona, Roundtable Perspectives: Researching Iraq Today (Arab Studies Institute, November 2015).
Menu