Frontiers in Social Science features new research in the flagship journals of the Social Science Research Council’s founding disciplinary associations. Every month we publish a new selection of articles from the most recent issues of these journals, marking the rapid advance of the frontiers of social and behavioral science.

The effects of species extinction on human mortality

The functional extinction of vultures, a keystone species that aids in the removal of carcasses, increased human mortality by 4% due to negative sanitation shocks in India.

Author(s)
Eyal Frank and Anant Sudarshan
Journal
American Economic Review
Citation
Frank, Eyal, and Anant Sudarshan. 2024. "The Social Costs of Keystone Species Collapse: Evidence from the Decline of Vultures in India." American Economic Review, 114 (10): 3007–40. Copy
Abstract

Scientific evidence has documented we are undergoing a mass extinction of species, caused by human activity. However, allocating conservation resources is difficult due to scarce evidence on damages from losing individual species. This paper studies the collapse of vultures in India, triggered by the expiry of a patent on a painkiller. Our results suggest the functional extinction of vultures—efficient scavengers that removed carcasses from the environment—increased human mortality by over 4 percent because of a large negative shock to sanitation. We quantify damages at $69.4 billion per year. These results suggest high returns to conserving keystone species such as vultures.

Women party activists and women’s political knowledge and behavior

Survey data from India suggest that women party activists are associated with increased contacting of women and higher levels of women’s political knowledge and participation.

Author(s)
Tanushree Goyal
Journal
American Political Science Review
Citation
GOYAL T. Representation from Below: How Women’s Grassroots Party Activism Promotes Equal Political Participation. American Political Science Review. 2024;118(3):1415-1430. doi:10.1017/S0003055423000953 Copy
Abstract

Extensive research investigates the impact of descriptive representation on women’s political participation; yet, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This article develops a novel theory of descriptive representation, arguing that women politicians mobilize women’s political participation by recruiting women as grassroots party activists. Evidence from a citizen survey and the natural experiment of gender quotas in India confirm that women politicians are more likely to recruit women party activists, and citizens report greater contact with them in reserved constituencies during elections. Furthermore, with women party activists at the helm, electoral campaigns are more likely to contact women, and activist contact is positively associated with political knowledge and participation. Evidence from representative surveys of politicians and party activists and fieldwork in campaigns, further support the theory. The findings highlight the pivotal role of women’s party activism in shaping women’s political behavior, especially in contexts with pervasive clientelism and persistent gender unequal norms.

Menu