How does violent military coercion work alongside liberal democratic values in contemporary iterations of imperialism? This article shows how the less-than-lethal paradigm occludes death and perpetuates extreme forms of both deadly and not-deadly military coercion in Iraq. Key to the 2003 invasion and subsequent counterinsurgency in Iraq, the less-than-lethal paradigm extends across military doctrine and US popular discourse. Based on the idea that killing is an undesirable way to dominate, the less-than-lethal paradigm is not necessarily benevolent or less deadly; instead, it is a legal, discursive, and logistical maneuver to minimize the political power of death and dying on the global stage. Decentering death, the less-than-lethal paradigm rebrands violence by reframing war as a precondition for peace, minimizing killing and death, disseminating nonkilling forms of coercion, and assigning responsibility to others for violence.

Although natural disaster often stimulates prosocial behavior, it is unclear whether more severe forms of disaster enhance or detract from these effects. We investigated the impact of flooding on prosociality, its moderation by social cohesion, and stress appraisal as a key mediator. Participants were drawn from a natural experiment of Hurricane Sandy (n = 1,182 flooded participants; n = 3,162 nonflooded controls). Flooded participants reported greater volunteering time and more varied volunteering tasks (ps < .0001), but not a greater likelihood of any volunteering, relative to controls. An instrumental variable analysis supported a causal effect of flood on greater volunteering time and more varied volunteering. Flooding also interacted with social cohesion so that greater volunteering time occurred only among individuals who reported moderate to high levels of cohesion. In addition, prior experience with rescue and recovery after the 9/11 terror attacks robustly predicted prosocial outcomes. Finally, stressful hurricane appraisals fully mediated the effect of flooding on greater volunteering time and more varied helping behavior, suggesting a key positive role for stress appraisals. Plausible confounds, such as residing in the inundation zone, evacuating, and demographic factors, did not account for the flood–prosocial behavior link. Findings indicate that severe disasters can promote more sustained and varied volunteering behavior, that a moderate degree of social cohesion may be necessary for sustained prosociality, and that stress appraisals are potential mechanisms of persistent prosocial responses to severe disaster. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)